Topic for today
There are several topics that governments disagree on, but a finite set of narratives exist on which they, and other central entities, concur. Three of those, without defence, are Covid, Central Banks and Antarctica. Climate change is the fourth. One more is soon to follow, but I'll address it in future posts.
Below links to the best abbreviated synopsis I am aware of, presented by a Nobel prize winner, presidential advisor and top professors and scientists. I’ve decided not to pour similar effort into this one. Please feel free to research geo-engineering, specifically chemtrails, over population and other matters such as HAARP, or DEW or even more obscure technologies, where the whistle has been blown on podcasts hosted by Shawn Ryan and others.
Consider the terminology change from "global warming" to "climate change" since the days of Al Gore. Main stream media narrative would let you believe that this is due to a widening of scope, but others would argue it's because warming does not hold water when compared to recent history of the 1930-40s.
Below is a link to an impressive documentary on climate change. The climate has always changed, and will always change. Martin Armstrong writes extensively on this.
The narrative that's forced down our throats is not statistically significant at all. It's just prolific propaganda that preys on an unsuspecting and ignorant public, delivered by the innocent face of a girl. You might not be aware, but the young Greta Thunberg have aged and has been replaced with a more diverse and youthful Xiye Bastida. What did Isaiah 3:4-5 note about babes?
I recall an interview on a US main stream news channel where a scientist contested the reporters point on climate change but was cut short, citing "technical reasons".
Below the video, and for those who read faster, a blow by blow. The first 4 parts cover the science and the second half the motives, impact and more.
Part 1 covers temperature.
Part 2 covers CO2 and its relationship with temperature.
Part 3 covers nature, sun, clouds, cosmic influence.
Part 4 covers extreme weather, heatwaves, fires, hurricanes.
Describes how research is funded by linking anything to climate change.
How scientists are sidelined when they contradict the consensus narrative.
A relentless need to link it to human cause which extends the reach of government control.
The video (watch at x2)
Detail
Herewith the points made in the documentary:
00:00:00 Section:
- Accuses climate science community of turning ecological concern into lucrative industry driven by self-interest and funding.
- Claims careers/livelihoods depend on perpetuating climate emergency narrative.
- Alleges bullying/intimidation of those who challenge climate alarm.
- Claims there is no evidence of climate emergency and it's a hoax/scam.
- Cites climate denier Professor Steven Koonin arguing against climate crisis.
00:05:00 Section:
- Challenges notion that climate change science is settled and temperatures are unprecedented.
- Cites skeptics like Will Happer and Dr. John Clauser questioning climate alarmism.
- Argues scientific truth is not determined by consensus.
- Uses Earth's climate history to show current temperatures are not unprecedented.
- Claims Earth is currently in relatively cool period compared to last 550 million years.
00:10:00 Section:
- Discusses historical warming trends and evolution of mammals in warmer climates.
- Notes Earth has been in an ice age for 50 million years with temperature fluctuations.
- Highlights warm periods like Roman, Medieval and says current trends are recovery from Little Ice Age.
- Challenges notion that 1°C rise since Little Ice Age is cause for alarm.
00:15:00 Section:
- Prof. Ross McKitrick discusses urban heat island effect impacting temperature records.
- Early 20th century thermometers avoided urban influences, later surrounded by development.
- Analysis of rural stations by Dr. Willie Soon shows temperatures peaked in 1940s, little recent warming.
- Ocean temperatures, tree rings, satellite data support lack of significant modern warming.
00:20:00 Section:
- Discusses satellites monitoring global temperatures developed by Dr. Roy Spencer and Prof. John Christy.
- Satellite analysis reveals most warming since 1880 due to urban heat island effect.
- Multiple data sources indicate official global temperature record shows inflated warming.
- Examines historical CO2 levels from plant fossils, showing much higher past levels.
00:25:00 Section:
- Discusses historical CO2 levels and correlation with temperature.
- CO2 at glacial lows, further drop would have killed all life.
- Temperature rises precede CO2 increases in ice core data.
- Industrial CO2 output doesn't match temperature record.
- CO2 has never driven temperature changes in the past.
00:30:00 Section:
- Criticizes climate models for producing too much warming, not matching observations.
- Argues CO2 is unimportant for climate, clouds are most powerful force.
- Links clouds to cosmic rays from supernovae based on work of Svensmark and Shaviv.
- Cloud cover related to Earth's journey around galaxy, matches geological temperature record.
- Solar magnetic activity affects cosmic rays reaching Earth.
00:35:00 Section:
- Challenges IPCC narrative that only CO2 can drive climate system.
- Willie Soon presents evidence linking solar activity to ocean temperature changes.
- Accuses IPCC of ignoring sun's impact and media of not reporting findings.
- Questions increasing extreme weather events, attributes to natural causes.
- Provides examples of historical temperature records contradicting warming.
00:40:00 Section:
- Challenges climate emergency notion by presenting data on fires, hurricanes, temperatures, drought, ice caps.
- Claims no increases in fires, hurricanes, drought; global temperatures stable since 1970s.
- Argues climate alarm is a hoax/scam and consensus is not based on evidence but funding.
- Suggests climate change became area of interest for academics to secure funding.
00:45:00 Section:
- Discusses how climate science funding comes primarily from government grants.
- After Cold War ended, climate change provided funding opportunities.
- Admitted defending climate change as student due to financial incentives.
- Created climate industry jobs in renewable energy, consulting etc.
- IPCC gathering cited as example of vast resources for climate research.
00:50:00 Section:
- Reveals various groups with vested interest in perpetuating climate crisis:
- Government bureaucrats, NGOs, carbon consultants, renewable energy leaders.
- Climate researchers existence relies on continued climate crisis .
- Scientists challenging narrative face marginalization and funding loss.
- Media ignores skeptics, promotes alarmist predictions regardless of accuracy.
- Calls climate crisis industry a "massive money scam" worth billions/trillions.
00:55:00 Section:
- Discusses political nature of climate consensus and environmental opposition to free market capitalism.
- Climate problem framed as result of irresponsible capitalism, requiring more government power.
- Supporting climate alarm synonymous with disdain for capitalism and desire for bigger government.
- Skeptics face ostracism and professional consequences, especially in public institutions.
- Svensmark and Shaviv discuss being shunned for challenging consensus.
01:00:00 Section:
- Dr. Matthew Wileicki shares experience of speaking out against climate change consensus.
- Faced backlash, isolation from funding, career ruin for expressing skepticism.
- Argues consensus has become a weapon to bully/intimidate non-conformists.
- Represents an attack on free scientific inquiry.
- Criticizes government involvement in climate issues and potential for increased control.
01:05:00 Section:
- Discusses how climate agenda has led to censorious authoritarian regime.
- Aims to control energy use, appliances, careers through enforced consensus.
- Activists calling for criminalizing skepticism, dissent dangerous for professionals.
- Criticizes climate alarmists' hypocrisy - enjoying capitalism while calling to limit consumption.
- Suggests environmentalists engage in class hypocrisy and self-interest masquerading as public concern.
01:10:00 Section:
- Criticizes environmentalists advocating for de-growth and limiting fossil fuels in Africa.
- Argues they have no connection to manufacturing/lives in developing countries.
- Highlights importance of fossil fuels for industrialization, clean water, food in Africa.
- Environmentalists oppose this development due to reducing emissions/consumption.
- Many African/Asian countries ignoring environmentalist demands, using fossil fuels.
01:15:00 Section:
- Claims climate agenda losing support as world doesn't follow emission cuts/renewables.
- People growing tired of climate alarmism and financial implications.
- Sustainability policy of restriction goes against everyday needs/desires.
- Climate skepticism accepted/supported in working-class communities.
- Punitive climate/Covid policies sparked protests, anti-establishment movements.
- Many view climate alarmism as invented scare for money/power.
whydoneit?
Does the above not sound similar to the Covid coercion?
As always: Why is the climate agenda pushed so aggressively?
The bad news is that this narrative will not die a quiet death.
It’s about to scale up.
I contest it's far more nefarious than any financial means to print money, but rather religious in nature. To this end, in a few posts from now, I'll be shedding my secular posts in favour of far more important matters.
See the last post in the series.