Executive summary
I’ve covered the plandemic here and here.
Recently, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. spoke to Tucker Carlson and vomited evidence of how vaccines lead to autism, and he also delivered COVID vax statistics and their pharmaceutical overlords.
A few weeks prior to that, Dr. Suzanne Humphries divulged evidence after evidence on a Joe Rogan podcast around the lack of vaccine efficacy in general.
Also, several new studies have been released expounding the short- and long-term negative effects of the COVID vaccines.
RFK on Tucker Carlson
Here’s the interview and below the evidence delivered:
A new CDC advisory committee
RFK Jr replaced the committee due to their conflicts of interest. They functioned as a "sock puppet" for the pharmaceutical industry it was supposed to regulate.
He cited a 2002 government oversight committee report that found 97% of ACIP members had undisclosed financial conflicts, with many directly tied to vaccine manufacturers.
For example, the approval of the rotavirus vaccine, where four out of five board members had financial interests in the vaccine, and one member, Paul Offit, profited significantly after voting to mandate it, later selling his own rotavirus vaccine for $186 million.
Their decisions, such as approving vaccines without proper placebo-controlled safety trials, were driven by financial incentives rather than public health, leading to a lack of rigorous safety studies and an increase in mandated vaccines from 11 in 1986 to 69-92 today.
Vaccines and autism
Since the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which granted vaccine manufacturers immunity from liability, the number of recommended vaccines has risen from 11 doses of 5 vaccines to 69-92 doses by age 18. This increase, driven by generating $1 billion annually due to a captive market rather than safety data, likely contribute to immune dysregulation and chronic conditions like autism, citing their listing as side effects.
The CDC conducted a handful of epidemiological studies on autism and vaccines, which were designed to find no link, using "fraudulent techniques." These studies were manipulated to downplay associations, citing a 1999 CDC study led by Thomas Verstraeten. This study initially found an 11,135% elevated risk of autism among children vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine within the first 30 days of life compared to those vaccinated later or not at all. The CDC altered the study through five iterations to obscure this link, including by excluding older children and stratifying data.
In 2001, the Institute of Medicine (IOM), part of the National Academy of Sciences, stated that a link between vaccines and autism is "biologically plausible." The IOM criticized the CDC’s vaccine schedule decision-making process, noting that the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was heavily influenced by industry due to financial entanglements. The IOM recommended a range of studies—animal models, observational studies, bench studies, and epidemiological studies—to thoroughly investigate the issue, but the CDC failed to conduct these, relying instead on the flawed epidemiological studies.
Over 100 external studies that suggest a link between vaccines and autism. He contrasts these with the CDC’s limited studies, which focused only on the MMR vaccine and thimerosal, ignoring vaccines administered in the first six months of life, which the IOM identified as potential culprits.
He announced plans to conduct comprehensive studies as recommended by the IOM, including observational, retrospective, and epidemiological research. These studies will compare health outcomes in fully vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups, using data from Medicaid, Medicare, and the Vaccine Safety Datalink. The data will be made publicly available to independent scientists for the first time, with grant requests issued to global research teams. Initial results are expected by September 2025, with definitive findings within six months thereafter.
Kennedy highlighted flaws in VAERS, the CDC’s voluntary reporting system for vaccine injuries, which he says captures fewer than 1% of injuries. A 2010 CDC-funded study at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, using a machine-counting system, found a 2.7% injury rate for vaccines (1 in 37), far higher than VAERS data. The CDC shelved this system, continuing to rely on VAERS despite its known deficiencies.
Since 1986, except for the COVID vaccine, none of the vaccines added to the childhood schedule underwent pre-licensing safety trials with a true placebo.
The increase in vaccines correlates with an "epidemic of immune dysregulation," including autoimmune diseases (diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis), neurological disorders (ADD, ADHD, autism, Tourette’s, narcolepsy), and allergic conditions (peanut allergies, eczema, anaphylaxis). These conditions were rare but are now ubiquitous and listed as side effects, suggesting vaccines as a potential culprit that requires study.
Pediatricians face financial pressures to vaccinate, with 50% of their revenue from vaccines and bonuses from insurance companies (e.g., Blue Cross) for achieving high vaccination rates (e.g., 95%). Pediatricians may expel patients who resist vaccines to protect these bonuses, creating perverse incentives that prioritize revenue over patient care.
ACIP approved a rotavirus vaccine despite conflicts, which was later withdrawn due to causing intussusception, a severe condition in children.
Pharmaceutical Industry and Media Influence
Kennedy criticizes the heavy influence of pharmaceutical advertising on media, noting that it constitutes a significant portion of revenue (e.g., 75% of evening news ad revenue) and distorts public health narratives.
Kennedy cites Roger Ailes, who said 17 of 22 ads on a typical evening news show are pharmaceutical, keeping networks financially afloat. He notes ads are tax-deductible, and Medicaid/Medicare covers the drugs, removing consumer financial accountability. The ads depict unrealistic benefits (e.g., jet-skiing, happy families) while downplaying side effects.
Kennedy recounts Ailes’s statement that discussing vaccine issues on Fox News would lead to immediate repercussions from pharmaceutical advertisers. He notes that media outlets like the New York Times and Rolling Stone banned him after his autism articles, driven by pharma’s revenue influence.
Pharmaceutical ads are misleading, promoting expensive drugs over generics and often funded by taxpayers through Medicaid/Medicare, with no consumer financial accountability.
Kennedy cites Mark Zuckerberg’s public statement that the White House ordered suppression of vaccine injury discussions on Facebook/Instagram. Discovery documents from Kennedy’s lawsuit against the Biden administration revealed that, 37 hours after Biden’s inauguration, a White House group was formed to suppress dissent, targeting Kennedy’s Instagram account (with nearly a million followers) despite his posts being sourced from government databases or peer-reviewed studies.
Kennedy and other critics of vaccine policies (e.g., Jay Bhattacharya, Marty Makary, Dr. Oz, Vinay Prasad) were censored for questioning vaccine safety and his removal from Instagram is an example, with no specific misinformation identified by Facebook, only the White House’s designation of his content as "malinformation."
Kennedy quotes Marcia Angell (former New England Journal of Medicine editor) and Richard Horton (Lancet editor), who stated journals have become "propaganda vessels" for pharma. Companies pay for publication, hire “mercenary scientists” to produce favorable studies, and distribute reprints to doctors via sales reps, often incentivizing prescriptions with perks.
COVID and mRNA
The COVID vaccine has resulted in more reported injuries than all other vaccines combined over the past 36 years, with Kennedy aiming to expand the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program to cover these cases.
The vaccine is no longer recommended for children under 18. A new version for those over 65 or with comorbidities will involve clinical trials.
The Pfizer vaccine’s clinical trial, involving 20,000 vaccinated individuals and 20,000 in a placebo group, showed a higher all-cause mortality rate in the vaccinated group than in the placebo group after six months, with a 23% increase in deaths from all causes.
The claim of "100% effectiveness" was misleading because it was based on a small dataset: only two people died from COVID-19 in the placebo group compared to one in the vaccinated group. This led to the assertion that the vaccine was 100% effective against COVID-19 deaths.
He criticized the focus on this narrow metric, noting that it implied the vaccine prevented all COVID-19 infections, which was later disproven as vaccinated individuals still contracted the virus. Kennedy claimed that to prevent one COVID-19 death, 19,999 vaccines were needed, suggesting that any vaccine-related adverse effects could negate this benefit. This critical detail was not communicated to the public!
Kennedy expresses skepticism about mRNA vaccine safety, noting insufficient studies and anecdotal reports of severe injuries, with plans for further research.
Hepatitis B Vaccine for Newborns
The hepatitis B vaccine, administered to newborns within an hour of birth, targets a disease primarily transmitted sexually or through needle-sharing, with a risk to one-day-old infants of one in seven million.
Kennedy notes that hospitals test mothers for hepatitis B, identifying those at risk of maternal transmission, making mass vaccination of newborns unnecessary. He suggests financial incentives drive this policy, as it guarantees revenue for pharmaceutical companies.
Anthony Fauci
For those who did not know, Fauci received a pre-emptive pardon from President Biden.
Kennedy criticizes Fauci’s role in funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, including techniques to hide lab origins of viruses, questioning the public health rationale. Fauci was part of a system that manipulated vaccine safety data and avoided transparency, such as through inadequate studies on autism links and flawed reporting via VAERS.
The preemptive pardon as an attempt to protect Fauci from scrutiny over these alleged cover-ups, especially given the pardon’s backdating to 2014, a period coinciding with controversial NIH-funded research in Wuhan.
Kennedy states that Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the NIH, financed studies at the Wuhan lab, a military-run facility. He claims Fauci provided the “precise technology” for developing the pathogen, and publications from these studies credit NIH for funding. Specifically, Fauci funded Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina, who developed a technique called “seamless ligation” (or “no-see-um” technique) to hide laboratory origins of manipulated viruses.
Kennedy describes the seamless ligation technique, developed by Ralph Baric, as a method to make lab-manipulated viruses appear natural. He argues this is contrary to public health interests, as it obscures the ability to identify lab-created pathogens. Kennedy questions why Fauci would provide this technology to a Chinese military lab, suggesting it raises serious ethical and security concerns.
Dr. Suzanne Humphries on Joe Rogan
In this Joe Rogan interview, Dr. Suzanne Humphries lists evidence after evidence refuting the efficacy of vaccines:
Polio and smallpox vaccines diagnostic criteria were changed post-vaccine introduction, artificially reducing reported cases of paralytic polio. Environmental toxins like DDT and arsenic poisoning were major contributors to polio-like paralysis historically.
Early polio vaccines were contaminated with SV40, a simian virus linked to cancer. Despite documented risks, this contamination was covered up, and vaccines continued to be manufactured using monkey kidney cells harboring SV40 for decades. This presents a potential long-term health impact on vaccinated populations, including an increase in kidney cancers and other diseases, illustrating significant lapses in vaccine safety oversight.
95-99% of polio infections are asymptomatic, indicating the virus is a normal commensal and not inherently dangerous. Oral polio vaccines can cause vaccine-derived poliovirus, contributing to modern polio cases. Smallpox vaccines historically contained bacteria, fungi, and other contaminants, not just smallpox virus, leading to infections. Caused tuberculosis and other diseases, with high rates of adverse reactions like ulcers and secondary infections.
Vaccine efficacy and safety trials frequently avoid using true saline placebos, instead using other vaccines as comparators, which masks adverse effects and inflates perceived benefits. This methodological flaw prevents an accurate understanding of vaccine risks and benefits. Additionally, long-term studies are scarce, and adverse events are often underreported or dismissed, undermining the scientific foundation of vaccine programs.
Environmental toxins (like pesticides, mercury, arsenic) and poor lifestyle factors (bad diet, lack of exercise, stress) significantly impair immune function and contribute to the burden of chronic disease. The decline in infectious disease mortality preceded vaccines and coincided with improvements in sanitation, nutrition, and living standards. Medical focus on pharmaceuticals often ignores these root causes, resulting in suboptimal health outcomes.
Breastfeeding supports immune tolerance by exposing infants to antigens naturally, whereas vaccines may disrupt this balance. This nuanced immunology is often overlooked in vaccine policy, contributing to unintended health consequences.
Aluminum in vaccines triggers TH2 immune response, linked to allergies and autoimmunity, potentially causing food allergies when combined with certain diets. Mercury in vaccines used as an antimicrobial, is a neurotoxin, with questionable safety despite claims of ethyl mercury being less harmful.
Tetanus vaccines do not guarantee immunity; natural immunity from environmental exposure is common, and proper wound care is critical. High-dose vitamin C and magnesium can prevent or treat tetanus effectively, reducing reliance on vaccines.
Widespread vaccination reduces natural boosting, increasing shingles rates in adults and children.
226 years of vaccine promotion, coupled with suppression of dissent (e.g., 1984 Federal Register), stifles open discussion. Andrew Wakefield case was misrepresented as fraudulent but his findings on MMR, autism, and gut disease were supported by later studies but suppressed.
Influenza Vaccine linked to kidney failure and hypertension.
Tonsillectomies increased bulbar polio risk by providing a pathway to the bloodstream and brain.
Further COVID studies
The Yale study builds on earlier research, including a 2022 Stanford study detecting mRNA and spike protein up to 8 weeks post-vaccination and a 2023 Harvard-linked study finding free spike protein in teens with post-vaccination myocarditis.
Ongoing global discussions about long-term vaccine effects, as evidenced by the World Health Organization’s recent update on July 1, 2025, acknowledging the need for further research into persistent spike protein issues.
The investigation into autoimmunity and Epstein-Barr virus reactivation as contributors to post-vaccination syndrome (PVS) reflects a growing scientific focus on vaccine-related immune responses.
A related study from April 2025 in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth found vaccinated pregnant women were 1.5 times more likely to miscarry than unvaccinated ones, adding to concerns about fertility impacts.
The Czech Republic’s health ministry reported a 25% increase in vaccine hesitancy among women of reproductive age since the study’s release, reflecting growing public concern.
A study published in April 2025 in the International Journal of Preventive Medicine found increased risks of cardiovascular events following COVID-19 vaccination, with specific risks including a 240% increase in stroke after the first dose, a 286% increase in heart attack after the second dose, a 244% increase in coronary artery disease after the second dose, and a 199% increase in arrhythmia after the first dose.
The study analyzed data from over 46 million vaccinated individuals compared to nearly 40 million unvaccinated individuals, providing a robust control group that strengthens the evidence of potential harm.
The appointment of Dr. Robert Malone to the U.S. Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in June 2025 reflects a shift in vaccine policy, potentially influencing future recommendations based on such safety concerns.
A Swedish nationwide study published in September 2024 found an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis 1-2 weeks after mRNA vaccination, adding to evidence of cardiovascular complications [academic.oup.com].
A Yale study released in June 2025 found mRNA and spike protein lingering over 700 days post-vaccination, raising questions about long-term heart effects.
The European Medicines Agency launched an investigation in June 2025 into mRNA vaccine batch variations, exploring links to adverse cardiovascular events.
A systematic review in ESC Heart Failure (2024) analyzing 28 autopsy cases, finding a high likelihood of causal links between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and fatal myocarditis, challenging the CDC’s claim of rare myocarditis cases (1-10 per 100,000 doses) with evidence of significant pathology in young adults.
This aligns with a 2023 Cleveland Clinic study (J Am Heart Assoc, PMID: 36974787) showing mRNA vaccine recipients had a dose-dependent risk of cardiac events, and a 2025 Yale study detecting spike protein persistence over 700 days, suggesting long-term cardiotoxic effects overlooked by initial safety trials.
The term "Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS)" introduced by the post lacks a standardized medical definition, contrasting with established Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), and may reflect a strategic narrative shift amid growing global skepticism, as seen in the WHO’s July 1, 2025, call for further vaccine safety research.
The FDA admitted Covid mRNA vaccines contain excess DNA contamination linked to a global cancer surge, based on an FDA study using NanoDrop and Qubit analyses.
Independent researchers like Kevin McKernan and Angus Dalgleish have warned of DNA fragments and SV40 promoters in vaccines potentially causing cancer, supported by a 2023 study (Frontiers in Oncology) showing genotoxicity risks.
The FDA’s silence on a recall suggests either caution or potential suppression, warranting further investigation into regulatory transparency.
A Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) study involving 99 million people, reveals a 610% increased risk of myocarditis, 378% for acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), 323% for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), and 249% for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) post-mRNA vaccination, challenging the CDC’s claim of rare myocarditis (1-10 per 100,000 doses) with robust multinational data.
Dr. Kary Mullis warned that PCR detects genetic material without proving active infection, supported by a 2012 Cell Research study showing PCR’s high sensitivity can detect non-viable viral fragments.
Recent CDC data from July 1, 2025, shows no unusual H5N1 activity in humans despite widespread bird testing, suggesting PCR’s overdiagnosis may drive culling and panic, as seen during COVID-19 when the CDC withdrew PCR use by December 2021 due to false positives.
A 2023 PMC review highlights PCR’s limitations in acute-care settings, noting poor specificity without clinical correlation, challenging its use as a pandemic trigger and urging reliance on symptom-based diagnostics instead.
Dr. Wu Zunyou, Chief Epidemiologist at the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, admits that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was not isolated, which is a critical step in verifying the existence and causality of a virus according to scientific standards like Koch's and Rivers' Postulates.
Supporting documents include a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) response from the U.S. CDC confirming, they do not possess an isolated, purified sample of SARS-CoV-2, and a scientific paper from the Journal of Medical Virology (2020) that does not provide evidence of virus isolation, aligning with claims that the virus's existence remains unproven.
whydoneit?
As they say, follow the money, but I sometimes suspect something more sinister, and perhaps Catherine Austin Fitts is right: It’s a depopulation agenda: